Is Concealed-Carry Good Or Bad?

              Last week when I was at the gun show, I overheard a conversation between three gents standing in line at the Dunkin’ Donuts kiosk, which was the most popular booth at the show. The topic being discussed in very serious tones was this: If you could only keep one handgun to carry around for self-defense, which gun would it be?

              Now readers of this column may find such a discussion ridiculous, stupid, or worse, but what do you want three guys on Social Security to talk about – the national debt? I mean, what could be more important to the future of American civilization than whether I should be walking around with a Sig, a Springfield or a Glock?

              The truth is that most, if not nearly all the 15 to 20 million Americans who go to the trouble of getting a concealed-carry (CCW) permit rarely, if ever actually carry a gun. First of all, you don’t need to carry a gun because it’s not as if you will ever find yourself in a situation where the gun would make the difference between getting or not getting hurt. Second, the gun is heavy and unless it’s kept concealed you’re going to wind up in the back of the patrol car with your gun comfortably resting on the front seat. Third and most important, sooner or later you’ll put the gun on the floor so that you’re more comfortable while you take a dump, and the gun will somehow not go back into the holster while you hitch up your pants.

              There isn’t a single boy in the United States who by the age of twelve hasn’t seen hundreds of bad guys being shot in video games, movies or TV.  If anything makes America exceptional, it’s how we have created a culture which celebrates ‘virtuous violence’ with the use of a gun. How many states now have stand-your ground laws?  Try thirty-three.

              Notwithstanding the sanctimonious and holier-than-thou preaching of so-called gun experts like David Hemenway and John Donahue, the fact is that gun owners with concealed-carry licenses are not only extremely law-abiding, but rarely, if ever, engage in unlawful or dangerous behavior with their guns. The last time I checked, the Violence Policy Center has still been unable to identify more than 600 CCW-licensed individuals who committed a fatal gun assault over the last 12 years.  Fifteen million people have CCW, less than 50 commit a fatal gun assault every year and that makes CCW-holders a threat to community safety?  Give me a break.

              On the other hand, anyone who thinks that these law-abiding armed citizens constitute the frontline of defense against all those street ‘thugs’ is also just blowing smoke.  Sure, every once in a while someone pulls a gun out from underneath the counter and plans to rob the mini-mart go awry. But the NRA has never been able to validate such acts of civilian bravery more than 50 times a year.  The bottom line is that the notion that we are becoming a nation of armed citizens basically gets down to the old guys who were amusing themselves talking about their favorite handgun while standing on the Dunkin’ Donuts line.

              What motivated me to write this column was an exchange between Corey Booker and Meghan McCain on The View, in which Meghan claimed that her brother would never give up his guns if Booker became President in 2021 and instituted a gun buyback plan. If the government repurchased all AR rifles there would be plenty of black guns that wouldn’t get turned in. But such a buyback would also result in no more new assault rifles being made or sold.

              Now if someone would finally be honest enough to admit that by repurchasing all guns which really cause gun violence (i.e., handguns) then maybe, just maybe we could end gun violence once and for all.  But if we did that, what would those guys waiting for their Dunkin’ Donuts coffee have to talk about?  The national debt?

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Is Concealed-Carry Good Or Bad?

  1. Daniel Webster seems to be competing with Donohoe and Hemenway these days, at least on twitter. But from the twitterverse, they treat RTC as including both states with Constitutional Carry and states with Shall Issue. I think there is a difference between putting a flag decal on my shirt and strapping one on vs. having to send a check, mug shots, and fingerprints to the State Police and then taking a sixteen hour class. That is Shall Issue, New Mexico style.

    I thought the original Connecticut synthetic paper out of Hopkins had some credibility because they took one state and tried to compare it to a bunch of model (synthetic) states, albeit one can argue with that approach too. But those authors clearly described what they were doing and the limits of the study. They did not infer the universe. But Donohoe threw all sorts of states into a computational Waring blender which to me, argues that we have too many unknowns compared to controls. You can play any game you want with confirmation bias and statistics. GI/GO.

    I think the simple story works best. CHL holders rarely cross the law. They also rarely use their guns in a SHTF situation. The number of mishaps, accidents, and guns left in the public johns needs to be factored into DGU vs. illegal uses.

    But you will never win an emotional argument with statistics, which is why this never seems to go anywhere. I had a physicist friend, since deceased, who wrote at least a dozen well written books disproving the existence of God. I don’t know anyone who changed their minds on whether that guy in the Larsen cartoon really exists after reading one of Vic’s books. I think the same can be said for the conversation round the Dunkin Donuts stand.

Leave a Reply